Iranian Persian Language and Literature Promotion Society Research on Mystical Literature HTTPS://JP 11 1 2017 04 21 The necessity of Re-edition of Bahâ-e Walad's Maāref The necessity of Re-edition of Bahâ-e Walad's Maāref 91 116 21599 10.22108/jpll.2017.21599 FA Bahman Nozhat Urmiyeh University Journal Article 2015 05 23    Maāref  of Bahâ-e Walad corrected and published the scientific and critical by Badi'o-zzaman Foruzanfar's efforts to base on four manuscripts for the first time in 1333  . Editor tried to correct components of three of Maāref into a single narrative, But he did not have the opportunity to identify the version of the complete and valid  of Maāref For this reason his printed version dose not compare completely with other versions valid which has recently been identified. The current edition of this book have not been edited fully respecting the principles. On the other hand some shortcomings in the process of revision, correction and editing the text style that caused an ambiguity in the text. For this reason, it is difficult to read and understand this great work. In this research, in addition to critique and review of the manuscripts of Maāref, the first manuscripts of the applied Foruzanfar are fully introduced, then some of the defects of this correction will be expressed by reference to the old version of Ayasophia and the copy of the library of the Konya.    Maāref  of Bahâ-e Walad corrected and published the scientific and critical by Badi'o-zzaman Foruzanfar's efforts to base on four manuscripts for the first time in 1333  . Editor tried to correct components of three of Maāref into a single narrative, But he did not have the opportunity to identify the version of the complete and valid  of Maāref For this reason his printed version dose not compare completely with other versions valid which has recently been identified. The current edition of this book have not been edited fully respecting the principles. On the other hand some shortcomings in the process of revision, correction and editing the text style that caused an ambiguity in the text. For this reason, it is difficult to read and understand this great work. In this research, in addition to critique and review of the manuscripts of Maāref, the first manuscripts of the applied Foruzanfar are fully introduced, then some of the defects of this correction will be expressed by reference to the old version of Ayasophia and the copy of the library of the Konya. https://jpll.ui.ac.ir/article_21599_f3d478052d7635bd3448156b3bc52690.pdf